Inner Cong state policies behind interruptions in Parliament: SP

INDIA, DELHI: The Samajwadi Celebration, which is assisting UPA from outside, on Wednesday, saw "internal The legislature politics" behind the interruptions by the BJP in Parliament thinking whether it was for changing Primary Reverend Manmohan Singh with Rahul Gandhi.
"Some individuals from within The legislature want to eliminate Manmohan Singh and generate the Yuvraaj. I have my questions if this state policies (demand of PMs resignation by BJP) is being performed out from within The legislature," mature SP head Mohan Singh said.
Congress, however, outrightly denied this declaration with party common assistant Janardan Dwivedi saying, "There can be no larger bogus creativity than this."

"The party has recurring this several periods...before 2009 elections, said in our manifesto that our Primary Ministerial selection is Manmohan Singh. After that also, we have said this several periods that he will keep stay the Primary Reverend until 2014. He (Mohan Singh) should not hassle about this," he said.
Regretting the recurring adjournment of Parliament, Singh claimed BJP was bringing up the CAG review to get ready the reasons for the arriving elections.
Meanwhile, SP General Secretary Ramgopal Yadav denied to provide any feedback on content created by party head Mohan Singh.
On the interruption of process in the Home, Ramgopal Yadav said, "Only a controversy can help in going towards the quality of problems. It's not necessary that whatever the Primary Reverend has said is appropriate and the accusations of BJP may also not be completely appropriate."
He said only a controversy on the problem can "bring out the actual image...After that, if BJP is not pleased, then they have every right to do whatever they want to".
Asked if the Primary Reverend was right in fighting the CAG review, the SP head said, "CAG is a constitutional system but it is not necessary that its review is always appropriate."
The Primary Reverend had on Thursday said the CAG review on the fossil fuel prevent allowance was defective and inaccurate.