INDIA, GHAZIABAD: A forensic professional could not response in a unique assess in Ghaziabad on Thursday some protection concerns on examples put from the landscape of the Aarushi-Hemraj dual killing, a attorney said.
Defence attorney Manoj Shishodia said the Main Forensic Technology Clinical BK Mahapatra said he did not keep in mind from which position at the killing identify he put which example.
Mahapatra had frequented the identify along with 12 other researchers May 1, 2008.
Aarushi, 14, was discovered killed at her parents' Noida property May 16, 2008. Our bodies of Hemraj was discovered the next day on the veranda of the home.
The cross-examination of Mahapatra was organised for the fifth day before the Main Institution of Research (CBI) Special Judge S Lal.
The assess adjourned the process until Wednesday, Shishodia said.
The protection attorney said Mahapatra said in the assess that he did not keep in mind whether a pillow situation discovered in Aarushi's space was of her own or of somebody else.
He said that Mahapatra's claims indicated that the CBI had did not identify the criminal activity technically.
Shishodia said that when the professional was requested whether he frequented images of the content gathered for doing assessments as per the guidelines set down by the Nationwide Qualification Panel of Examining and Calibration Labs (NABL), the researcher responded to in adverse.
The researcher stated that the CFSL followed its own guide, he said.
Teen Aarushi's dad Rajesh Talwar and mom Nupur Talwar are the charged in the dual killing.
Nupur Talwar was taken into legal care Apr 30 and she pushed in the top assess the May 31 Allahabad Great Purchase from the assess rejecting her help request. She is filed in Dasna prison in Ghaziabad. Her partner is out on help.
No comments:
Post a Comment